*Money Printing*
A seemingly simple, yet confusing topic.
I mean, why even sell bonds to the public, when the Fed can just print more dollars and pay for whatever the government wants to spend?
The answer is simple but requires a little critical thinking.
Time for a Fed π§΅π
A seemingly simple, yet confusing topic.
I mean, why even sell bonds to the public, when the Fed can just print more dollars and pay for whatever the government wants to spend?
The answer is simple but requires a little critical thinking.
Time for a Fed π§΅π
Even so, he seemed to really struggle with the basic concepts and how Treasuries work
Let's be honest, these are hard concepts to grasp
So, letβs break them down, nice and simple, to understand.
Let's be honest, these are hard concepts to grasp
So, letβs break them down, nice and simple, to understand.
π§ Money Supply Basics
To understand 'money printing' we must first understand money basics. Or rather, 'money supply' basics
We will keep it super high level here and easy to understand.
To understand 'money printing' we must first understand money basics. Or rather, 'money supply' basics
We will keep it super high level here and easy to understand.
Narrow Money
At the most restrictive end of the money supply measures, we have what is called narrow money, or M0 (βem-zeroβ)
This includes only currency in circulation and cash kept in reserve by banks. M0 is often referred to as the monetary base
At the most restrictive end of the money supply measures, we have what is called narrow money, or M0 (βem-zeroβ)
This includes only currency in circulation and cash kept in reserve by banks. M0 is often referred to as the monetary base
Moving up one notch, we have what is known as M1
M1 includes all of M0 plus demand deposits, plus any outstanding travelerβs checks
Demand deposits are simply liquid deposits in bank accounts that can be withdrawn by a customer at any time, i.e., customer checking and savings
M1 includes all of M0 plus demand deposits, plus any outstanding travelerβs checks
Demand deposits are simply liquid deposits in bank accounts that can be withdrawn by a customer at any time, i.e., customer checking and savings
Hold up, you say, banks don't actually have all this cash in the safe, ready for withdrawal, right?
Didn't we learn this with the bank collapses this past year?
Didn't we learn this with the bank collapses this past year?
Exactly
Banks donβt hold all your cash in their vaults. They use risk analysis estimate how much needs to be available at various branches in absence of a run at the bank
The rest is just 0s and 1s on a digital ledger that they keep
**Remember that 'digital' part for later.
Banks donβt hold all your cash in their vaults. They use risk analysis estimate how much needs to be available at various branches in absence of a run at the bank
The rest is just 0s and 1s on a digital ledger that they keep
**Remember that 'digital' part for later.
I know what you're thinking:
What the heck happened in 2020 that cause the M1 money supply to skyrocket higher?
You got it: *Money Printing*
We will get to that in a bit, but let's first unpack the next level of money supply, the wider calculation of it, called broad money.
What the heck happened in 2020 that cause the M1 money supply to skyrocket higher?
You got it: *Money Printing*
We will get to that in a bit, but let's first unpack the next level of money supply, the wider calculation of it, called broad money.
Broad Money
Moving our scope out a little bit, M2 includes all of M1 plus money market savings deposits, time-restricted deposits under $100K (i.e., CDs and money markets)
In other words, M2 includes all money that is held in cash equivalent accounts, liquid and semi-liquid.
Moving our scope out a little bit, M2 includes all of M1 plus money market savings deposits, time-restricted deposits under $100K (i.e., CDs and money markets)
In other words, M2 includes all money that is held in cash equivalent accounts, liquid and semi-liquid.
Why?
The Cantillon Effect
Named after Richard Cantillon, an 18th-century economist, the Cantillon Effect describes how those who receive new money first (ie, banks, government, or financial institutions) benefit, while others further down the line experience delayed effects.
The Cantillon Effect
Named after Richard Cantillon, an 18th-century economist, the Cantillon Effect describes how those who receive new money first (ie, banks, government, or financial institutions) benefit, while others further down the line experience delayed effects.
Now let's explain what Jared Bernstein had so much difficulty describing (and apparently understanding himself)
The US Treasury Bond.
The US Treasury Bond.
π€ Treasury Bond Basics
In the most basic form of definition, a US Treasury Bond is a bond issued by the US government. This is no different than a bond issued by Apple or Microsoft or Tesla
It is the country (or company) borrowing money from people who buy the bond.
In the most basic form of definition, a US Treasury Bond is a bond issued by the US government. This is no different than a bond issued by Apple or Microsoft or Tesla
It is the country (or company) borrowing money from people who buy the bond.
And what happens when you borrow money?
Right. You pay interest to the one(s) who lent it to you
Just like you pay the bank interest on your mortgage. You borrowed money from the bank to buy the house, you pay the bank interest for that loan.
Simple.
Right. You pay interest to the one(s) who lent it to you
Just like you pay the bank interest on your mortgage. You borrowed money from the bank to buy the house, you pay the bank interest for that loan.
Simple.
Now. We all know that the government has been borrowing a massive amount lately
This is because the government operates in a deficit (it spends more than it receives in tax revenues) and it makes up the difference by borrowing
This adds to the US Public Debt.
This is because the government operates in a deficit (it spends more than it receives in tax revenues) and it makes up the difference by borrowing
This adds to the US Public Debt.
So, basically, you and me and others buying bonds directly in their IRAs, 401Ks, personal accounts, and indirectly through mutual funds & money markets (yellow), US banks (green), foreign central banks, ie, Bank of Japan, Bank of China, and other foreign buyers (brown)...
But hold up
What's that blue area?
You got it.
The US Federal Reserve itself.
What's that blue area?
You got it.
The US Federal Reserve itself.
How do they possibly own all those US Treasuries, you ask?
Well, the money printer, of course
Let me explain.
Well, the money printer, of course
Let me explain.
π«£ How Money is 'Printed'
If you have been following me, you know all about the Federal Reserve monetary tools QE and QT
If not, or if you need a quick refresher, these stand for Quantitative Easing (QE) and Quantitative Tightening (QT).
If you have been following me, you know all about the Federal Reserve monetary tools QE and QT
If not, or if you need a quick refresher, these stand for Quantitative Easing (QE) and Quantitative Tightening (QT).
In periods of financial distress or recession, like the Great Financial Crisis, we saw the Fed use QE with a sort of shotgun approach, buying up US Treasuries and MBS (Mortgage Backed Securities) with reckless abandon
And QT is when the Fed sells them back to the market.
And QT is when the Fed sells them back to the market.
In reality, it's much less exciting
Basically, the Fed, as the US Central Bank, has the unique ability to create money
When the Fed uses QE to purchase securities like Treasuries, it does so by creating bank reserves out of thin air
This is a digital process of money creation.
Basically, the Fed, as the US Central Bank, has the unique ability to create money
When the Fed uses QE to purchase securities like Treasuries, it does so by creating bank reserves out of thin air
This is a digital process of money creation.
Here's how it works:
β’ The Fed announces its intention to purchase securities and the amount it intends to buy
β’ Primary dealers (big intermediary banks) then buy these securities in the open market on behalf of the Fed
...
β’ The Fed announces its intention to purchase securities and the amount it intends to buy
β’ Primary dealers (big intermediary banks) then buy these securities in the open market on behalf of the Fed
...
β’ Once a purchase is made, the Fed credits the reserve accounts of the primary dealers with newly created money and puts the Treasuries on its own balance sheet
β’ This crediting increases the total reserves of these banks, injecting liquidity directly into the banking system
β’ This crediting increases the total reserves of these banks, injecting liquidity directly into the banking system
In essence, the primary dealer acts as a broker and settles the trades, sending this new-found capital to the seller of the Treasuries and sending the Treasuries to the Fed, and *voila*
More cash enters the system.
More cash enters the system.
Just press a button and Wham-O
*New Money*
*New Money*
Imagine you are playing a game of monopoly where all the money has been distributed and is already in the game
Then a new player shows up to the game with a fist full of money from a Monopoly game from *his* house. And he just starts buying property left and right.
Then a new player shows up to the game with a fist full of money from a Monopoly game from *his* house. And he just starts buying property left and right.
What has happened, is he has added new money to the game that was not there before
He *expanded the money supply*
And so, Park Place and Boardwalk just got way more expensive.
He *expanded the money supply*
And so, Park Place and Boardwalk just got way more expensive.
And this is effectively what the Fed is doing when it institutes QE and buys bonds in the open market
The Fed adds money to the markets that was not there before, injecting liquidity into those markets.
The Fed adds money to the markets that was not there before, injecting liquidity into those markets.
As for the "why don't we just print money and skip the whole QE and Treasury borrowing system" question,
If we did this, we would fully transform into what is known as a 'Banana Republic', where blatant and excessive money printing to fund gov't deficits leads to hyperinflation.
If we did this, we would fully transform into what is known as a 'Banana Republic', where blatant and excessive money printing to fund gov't deficits leads to hyperinflation.
Imagine a world where the Treasury (Congress, really) just spends as much as they want, and the Fed just prints however much is needed to allow for that spending.
Unchecked. Unabated. Unabashed.
Unchecked. Unabated. Unabashed.
Prices would rise exponentially as the expansion of the money supply skyrocketed (Park Place and Boardwalk would go for millions, billions, then trillions), people would lose confidence in the USD as a store of value and at some point, a means of exchange.
It would lead to loss of confidence, chaos, and a rapid path to hyperinflation.
The collapse of the US dollar.
The collapse of the US dollar.
No no. The Fed and Treasury will do anything to obfuscate and deflect any attention to the infinite ink-cartridge money printer.
They will sell bonds instead.
Even if to themselves.
They will sell bonds instead.
Even if to themselves.
This thread is a summary of a recent issue of π‘The Informationist, the newsletter that simplifies one financial concept for you weekly.
You can join 35K+ readers here: jameslavish.com
You can join 35K+ readers here: jameslavish.com
Loading suggestions...