13 Tweets 1 reads Apr 18, 2024
Despite either agreeing to the permanent division of Kashmir or providing full backing for it, AJK politicians still have the audacity to peddle rhetoric on Indian-occupied Kashmir.
2.However, the truth remains glaring: the entire political elite of Azad Kashmir, comprising both Pakistani political parties and local factions, adamantly refused to advocate for the Kashmiri people.
3.Publicly, they maintained their status as a local authority, disavowing any authority to speak on behalf of Kashmiris.
4. This stance persisted even amidst India's forceful annexation of Kashmir on August 5, 2019, which entailed nullifying its special status and Article 35A, thereby facilitating demographic changes.
5. Kashmir found itself besieged by a million soldiers, with widespread attacks on homes, abductions of children and youths, and the looming threat of genocide.
6. The complete silence and refusal to speak for the people of Indian-occupied Kashmir by the political elite of Azad Kashmir was carefully orchestrated as they had already cemented the division of Kashmir, keeping the Kashmiris in utter darkness.
7. Fast forward six years, and the political elite of Azad Kashmir have changed their tune, now invoking the cause of Kashmir—but not for the welfare of its people, but rather for their own interests.
8. Their concern seems to revolve less around the lives lost in Kashmir and more about maintaining the status quo. To them, the bloodshed in Kashmir serves as a perverse lifeblood, fueling their political agendas.
9.It's imperative to understand: they do not genuinely represent Indian-occupied Kashmir.
However, it's crucial to acknowledge that this exploitation yields no positive results.
Instead, it worsens the division between the two parts of Kashmir bec people in Indian-occupied Kashmir are keenly aware of the self-serving motivations of #AJK politicians. This manipulation by the political elite deepens mistrust and widens the gap b/w the Kashmiris.

Loading suggestions...