#COP28 new text on Article 6.2 bilateral trading
➡️still no common definitions
➡️still minimal control over process
➡️slightly stronger "encourages" vs "may" on content of info submissions, tho has the rider "as appropriate"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
➡️still no common definitions
➡️still minimal control over process
➡️slightly stronger "encourages" vs "may" on content of info submissions, tho has the rider "as appropriate"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
#COP28 new text on Article 6.2 bilateral trading
➡️brings back much more detail on "identifying…and correcting inconsistencies"
➡️retains loose process around confidentiality
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
➡️brings back much more detail on "identifying…and correcting inconsistencies"
➡️retains loose process around confidentiality
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
#COP28 new text on Article 6.2 bilateral trading
➡️still no common definitions
➡️still minimal control over process
➡️slightly stronger "encourages" vs "may" on content of info submissions, tho has the rider "as appropriate"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
➡️still no common definitions
➡️still minimal control over process
➡️slightly stronger "encourages" vs "may" on content of info submissions, tho has the rider "as appropriate"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
#COP28 new text on Article 6.2 bilateral trading
➡️slightly tightens language around changes to authorisation, a key concern of carbon mkt participants
➡️still allowed but must be "…made publicly available…or…under extreme circs"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
➡️slightly tightens language around changes to authorisation, a key concern of carbon mkt participants
➡️still allowed but must be "…made publicly available…or…under extreme circs"
L: 9 Dec
R: 12 Dec
carbonbrief.org
Loading suggestions...