34 تغريدة 1 قراءة Nov 14, 2023
1) Welcome to a LIVE #accredited #tweetorial from #AHA23 @American_Heart in #Philadelphia on advances in #hyperlipidemiamanagement #LLT. Our expert returning faculty is Erin Michos MD @ErinMichos #cardiologist #lipids from @HopkinsMedicine.
#CardioTwitter #MedEd #FOAMed
2) This program is supported by an educational grant from Esperion Therapeutics & is intended for #HCPs. Statement of accreditation & faculty disclosures at cardiometabolic-ce.com. Earn .75hr 🆓CE/#CME by following this 🧵!
@MedTweetorials
3) #Statins remain foundational tx for #hyperlipidemia, but too many pts are intolerant (especially ♀️) or need add-on therapy to statins. Lipid levels & markers of #ASCVD residual risk (like #hsCRP) are such important #CV risk measures, it's no surprise we have 🆕data at #AHA23!
4a) Let's start with an important presentation on 11/11 #AHA23 by Drs @emily_decicco & @AnnMarieNavar about lipid lowering therapy #LLT and #LDLC control for primary #ASCVD prevention in persons with #diabetes across 90 US health systems.
4b) #ASCVD remains the leading cause of ☠️in persons with #diabetes ➡️ the 2019 @ACCinTouch @American_Heart guideline gave a class I recommendation for use of #statins in persons with diabetes for the primary ASCVD prevention. So how well is this recommendation implemented?
5a) Using the Cerner Real-World Data across 90 US health systems with #EHR, the authors evaluated use of lipid lowering therapy #LLT among 241,232 patients (53% ♀️) with #diabetes but without #ASCVD for #primary_prevention. #AHA23
5b) Among these patients with #diabetes, disappointingly only 58.1% were on moderate- to high-intensity #statin & 35% were on no statin! Women were less likely to be on moderate- to high-intensity statin than men. Older patients were more likely to be on appropriate statin.
6a) #LDLC control was suboptimal at baseline (37.0% and 27.9% had LDL-C ≥100 &<70 mg/dL, respectively). Patients with #diabetes with highest LDLC were more likely to be on no statin, and conversely, those with controlled LDLC more likely on high-intensity #statin.
6b) Sadly, things were not much better at one year, with the rate of moderate- to high-intensity #statin therapy utilization was 65.3%, among these patients with #diabetes highlighting clinical inertia in #LLT.
#AHA23
7a) So maybe these pts with #diabetes were on non-statins instead? Nope. There was suboptimal use of evidence-based non-statin LLT (i.e., #ezetimibe, #PCSK9i). Conversely there was significant use of #niacin & #fibrates, which do not have data supporting #CV outcome benefit.
7b) Persons with #diabetes with #inflammatory risk enhancers were LESS likely to be on #statins, but those with diabetes-specific risk enhancers of #retinopathy & #neuropathy& #CKD were more likely to be on statins.
9) Congratulations to @emily_decicco, @AnnMarieNavar, and colleagues on their work and simultaneous publication!
#AHA23
10a) More from #AHA23! So, #hsCRP as a marker for #ASCVD risk.
On 13NOV the esteemed #lipidologist #PaulRidkerMD presented 🆕 data from #CLEAR_OUTCOMES: #bempedoic_acid v placebo in 13,970 pts with #ASCVD or high #CV risk, #LDL_C 100+, & documented #statin intolerance.
11b) This helped advance the concept of #atherosclerosis as--at least in part--an #inflammatory disorder. Though lipid management remains 1st line for #cvPrev, CV events still occur in statin-Rx patients, w/#hsCRP established as an effective marker of residual inflammatory risk.
11c) In a recent analysis of 31,245 statin-treated patients at high ASCVD risk, residual inflammatory risk (as assessed by #hsCRP) was a more powerful determinant of CV death than residual cholesterol risk (as assessed by #LDLC). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
12a) Let’s look to another 2o analysis of #CLEAR_OUTCOMES! As we saw in the main trial, #bempedoic acid reduced median #hsCRP by 21.6% and mean #LDLC levels by 21.1% at 6 months, compared to placebo.
12b) In this 🆕#AHA23 analysis, the highest baseline #hsCRP quartile (vs lowest) was significantly associated w/ a 43% increase in the primary 4pt #MACE endpoint [HR 1.43 (1.24-1.65)] & 2-fold higher CV mortality [HR 2.00 (1.53-2.61)] & all-cause mortality [HR 2.21 (1.79-2.73)]!
12c) On other hand, the highest vs lowest baseline #LDLC was less strongly associated with the primary 4pt #MACE endpoint [HR 1.19 (1.04-1.37) and not associated with #CV #mortality [HR 0.90 (0.70-1.17)] or all-cause mortality [HR 0.95 (0.78-1.16)].
12d) In other words, among these contemporary patients with #statin_intolerance, #inflammation assessed by #hsCRP predicted risk of future #CV events and mortality more strongly than lipids assessed by #LDLC, similar to prior analysis of statin-Rx patients
13) Now, these data should not be used to diminish the important role of #LLT for #CV prevention but do suggest that targeting #LDLC alone is unlikely to entirely reduce #ASCVD risk. Addressing inflammatory pathways as part of risk reduction should be further explored.
14) It should be noted that compared with placebo, #Bempedoic acid reduced #cardiovascular events similarly across all levels of #hsCRP and #LDLC, with effect modification.
15) In sum, the CLEAR Outcomes trial provides a sound rationale for use of #bempedoic acid to reduce major adverse #CV outcomes in patients intolerant to statins, including those at high #inflammatory risk.
#AHA23
16a) So what did I learn from these presentations?
🫀 We still have a long way to go in implementing #GDMT for #lipid management among patients at high #CV risk such as those with #T2D and we need to better utilize combination therapy
(cont)
16b) (cont)
🫀 #Bempedoic_acidis a great non-statin alternative for statin intolerant patients with proven efficacy to reduce #CV events
🫀 Nevertheless, even on #LLT, elevated #hsCRP predicts residual risk, offering opportunities to specifically address inflammatory pathways
17a) Quick knowledge checks before we go:
According to new data from #AHA23, persons with #diabetes and elevated #ASCVD risk are more likely to use which non-statin therapy, despite lack of evidence of ASCVD benefit?
A. #bempedoic acid
B. #ezetimibe
C. fibrates
D. #PCSK9i
17b) Unfortunately the correct answer is C. Same applies to niacin—no known help, but used alot, whereas efficacious options such as the other 3 are UNDERutilized in pts with #diabetes.
18a) Which statement about #hsCRP is FALSE?
A. ⬆️hsCRP levels are associated with ⬆️ #CV risk
B. statin tx ⬇️ hsCRP levels
C. add-on tx such as bempedoic acid may ⬇️LDLC levels beyond statin tx, but not hsCRP levels
D. hsCRP levels can measure residual CV risk in statinRx pts
18b) It's C. As shown in the #AHA23 data presented by Ridker, #bempedoic_acid can reduce #LDLC levels beyond the benefit of statins, and also reduces #hsCRP levels, indicating a positive impact on inflammation.
19) So thank you for joining us--@cardiomet_ce LIVE IN THE HOUSE from #AHA23--you feel like you were there, right? That's due to great work by expert author @ErinMichos! Now celebrate by claiming 0.75hr 🆓 CE/#CME at cardiometabolic-ce.com & then 🖱️ back here & FOLLOW US!
TYPO HERE: should be WITHOUT effect modification

جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...