We need to understand that #plasmidgate has revealed so many insidious "coincidences" about this genomic sequence that there seems to be only one logical conclusion about the presence of plasmid DNA in COVID jabs.
The fact that multiple mechanisms for nuclear integration (i.e. genome modification) of plasmid DNA in one product exist coincidentally is so improbable that Occam beats Hanlon in the Razor stakes. Easily.
But this raises a new question. That is, how many scientists are there in the world that have experience in all these areas enough to design a product - all the way from virus to genetic vaccine - that created an end result that was impossible by chance.
To recap
▶ A new coronavirus that could not exist in nature
▶ A furin cleavage site that doesn't belong in this class of viruses and was so unstable it disappeared at the first genomic evolution in nature
▶ Retention of that furin cleavage site in a vaccine design, when this was against all previous protocols ▶ Retention of the full length of the spike protein when the principle of vaccine design is not to exactly replicate toxic proteins of viruses (see the design of the Spikogen vaccine without these elements)
▶ Plasmid DNA found in the vaccine in therapeutic concentrations (#plasmidgate)
▶ Use of the oncogenic SV40 enhancer in the plasmid production of the "mRNA" vaccine which acts as a nuclear localisation signal (NLS) (#NLSGate)
▶ The presence of the NLS in the spike protein (PRRARSV) which is the very furin cleavage site that shouldn't be in the virus or vaccine
▶ A clumsy attempt to cut up plasmid DNA which then renders short segments of linear DNA which has a higher risk of integrating into the genome
▶ The presence of high potency lipid nanoparticles made from products not approved for medical use, which can act as nuclear transfectants in both mRNA candidates (and an equivalent in Novavax - see #Novagate)
▶ The attack on the Jiang-Mei paper (see #NIHgate) which showed that spike protein from the mRNA products was acting in the nucleus
▶ The inclusion of an ORF in the polyA tail of a supposed mRNA vaccine
The question is not "How many coincidences before coincidence becomes mathematically impossible?"
The question is "How many people are there in the world that can design a genomic sequence masquerading as a virus in order to impose a genetic therapy product on the world that was found to have multiple mechanisms for genomic integration that could never have happened by chance?"
The answer. Less than 10.
@CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @P_J_Buckhaults @JesslovesMJK @AdhesionsOrg

Reference for mutations affecting the furin cleavage site early on - published July 2020.
Submitted 15th June 2020.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Uh-oh @joshwalkos looks like you upset some very powerful people.
@elonmusk you might want to have a look at this.
The tweet only appears in a logged in session. Otherwise it "doesn't exist".
First picture, logged in.
Second picture incognito mode.