I had a look at the 'Bharat: The Mother of Democracy' booklet issued during the G20 summit and was quite appalled to see the sophistry, fabrications, and outright lies contained in it. I am sorry to say but this is an assault on intelligence. Some thoughts. #Thread
The text then says: “Bharat is the official name of the country. It is mentioned in the Constitution as also in the discussions of 1946-48.” This cleverly removes India and implies that Bharat is the only official name of the state.
And while it mentions that there were deliberations on this from 1946-48 (in the Constituent Assembly), it omits what resulted from those deliberations. That the debate was settled after the amendment motion was defeated. India and Bharat both are official names of the country.
Tangible, observable proof. And power should always rest with the people. What people’s power do we see in the Mahabharata? None! Who looks for democracy in religion or religious literature?
They chose a raja who was a Kshatriya and the son of the previous chief. This gana-sangha didn’t meet regularly; instead, an elite council of 9 men ruled. Scholars identify the gana-rajyas as oligarchies, not democracies.
Brahmins chose other Brahmins. And they lived under an absolute monarch—the Cholan king. Democracy much?
This booklet is a sad commentary on the state of affairs under this current govt. But it is an excuse for Mr. Modi’s monarchical style of govt. If you tell the people that absolute monarchs of yore were democrats, you could rule as a Bhagwa Badshah and still call it a democracy.
Loading suggestions...