The @FatManTerra / shill method
- claim that signing an arbitrary message using private key is too risky despite multiple wallet’s implementation, not just bitcoin core.
- get outed for bullshit gaslighting “you don’t know how bitcoin works”
Binance didn’t have to move coins.
- claim that signing an arbitrary message using private key is too risky despite multiple wallet’s implementation, not just bitcoin core.
- get outed for bullshit gaslighting “you don’t know how bitcoin works”
Binance didn’t have to move coins.
CZ literally told everyone two weeks ago that moving coins to prove reserves is a sign of problems.
CZ then contradicts himself and Fatmanterra starts gaslighting about how functionality built into multiple wallet software is risky.
CZ then contradicts himself and Fatmanterra starts gaslighting about how functionality built into multiple wallet software is risky.
I'm getting a common criticism on this, "Bitcoin exchanges shard the keys for security so they can't sign messages".
Then the exchanges deliberately implemented a system that they can never prove they have the bitcoins, they can only prove they moved bitcoins to a new address.
Then the exchanges deliberately implemented a system that they can never prove they have the bitcoins, they can only prove they moved bitcoins to a new address.
The new address, can't be proven to be their own address until they move them to a new address... which then can't be proven to be their own until they move them to a new address... which can't be proven to be their own until they move them...
vs just signing a fucking message.
vs just signing a fucking message.
Loading suggestions...