OAuth 1.0 vs OAuth 2.0.
Thread ๐งต
Thread ๐งต
OAuth stands for Open Authorization.
It allows users to let third-party access web resources without sharing their passwords.
It also allows for secure authentication of users by third-party applications.
It allows users to let third-party access web resources without sharing their passwords.
It also allows for secure authentication of users by third-party applications.
You can check out the detailed thread about OAuth.
OAuth 1.0 is transport-independent, meaning security is not dependent on HTTPS?/TLS only.
But OAuth 2.0 is transport-dependent on HTTPS/TLS.
But OAuth 2.0 is transport-dependent on HTTPS/TLS.
OAuth 1.0 is not browser-based.
Desktop or mobile applications direct users to open the browser, authenticate with the service, copy the access token, and then return to the application.
This overall workflow generates a bad User Experience.
Desktop or mobile applications direct users to open the browser, authenticate with the service, copy the access token, and then return to the application.
This overall workflow generates a bad User Experience.
A digital signature is used to prove the authenticity of a message in OAuth 1.0.
With OAuth 2.0, we now have Bearer Token, which we can use to make an API call.
Hence, OAuth 2.0 signatures are much less complicated.
With OAuth 2.0, we now have Bearer Token, which we can use to make an API call.
Hence, OAuth 2.0 signatures are much less complicated.
OAuth 2.0 is much more flexible compared to OAuth 1.0.
OAuth 1.0 can only handle web-based clients whereas OAuth 2.0 can handle non-web clients as well.
OAuth 1.0 can only handle web-based clients whereas OAuth 2.0 can handle non-web clients as well.
With that said, these are a few basic differences between OAuth 1.0 and OAuth 2.0.
Follow @Rapid_API for more exclusive content. ๐๐
Follow @Rapid_API for more exclusive content. ๐๐
Loading suggestions...