رتبها

@icarus62 @freemonotheist brother, I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the feeling of God’s presence is very deep and linked to the structure of human consciousness, so that if a child is born on an island devoid of humans, he will go on his own to God, as studies have proven. Even many of the

@icarus62 @freemonotheist philosophers of atheism could not abandon this deep feeling, and I mentioned to you above some studies, and this applies even to children born in a completely atheistic environment, such as Japan and Finland.
And this really raises a great question, why is a person born with a

@icarus62 @freemonotheist tendency to God inside him, even if he lives in an atheistic environment?

@icarus62 @freemonotheist
This is not true, Oliveira herself said that children (born in an atheistic environment) tended to admit the existence of a Creator as an explanation for the existence of this universe

@icarus62 @freemonotheist
This is also not true. The deep feeling that there is a greater cause for this universe does not belong to (some people), as you said, but it is present in almost all people as studies have proven,

@icarus62 @freemonotheist and this appears especially in children before they are polluted with atheistic thoughts. And belief in God is not the same as belief in imaginary beings at all. The existence of God is the only explanation for the existence of the universe,

@icarus62 @freemonotheist An atheist may say: " I did not believe this badger sense? Is it not better to say: heading to heaven is a primitive feeling that does not deserve those who glorify the mind to pay attention to it! "
the answer of the former objector is found in the words of the (Paul Cuban):

@icarus62 @freemonotheist We are bound to believe in a sense of faith; Because we give in to what reason and sense tell us and believe them; The heart, the mind, and the senses are of one origin, whether you say he is nature or you say he is God.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Excluding the heart’s sense of faith with a commitment to believe the claims of reason and sense is a contradiction Participation in the original reason to say participation in the judiciary If you deny the sense of faith, you must deny everything that your mind or sense tells u

@icarus62 @freemonotheist And this is a great quote by George Joyce (British Logician)

@icarus62 @freemonotheist The loss of the divine presence is a reason for life to lose its meaning. If life loses its meaning, suicide becomes the only answer to the biggest existential question about the meaning of life.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist The atheist answered - in fact - about the crisis of meaning that appeared in the crisis of suicide; Statistics indicate in 2004 - as in the "American Journal of Psychiatry" - that atheistic belief is a motivating factor for material suicide; It revealed that non-religious…

@icarus62 @freemonotheist people are the most attempting suicide.
This is what psychology research has concluded, and it is recognized by many of the scholars of atheism, and it is the same as what the Qur’an said [Taha: 124]

@icarus62 @freemonotheist The argument here is that just as knowledge of sickness and well-being is inferred from a defect in physical health and what gives the body its strength; Likewise, faith is inferred that it is true, by the fact that it is a health for the soul and the body,

@icarus62 @freemonotheist and that the disorder of the heart with the scourge of atheism is an argument that atheism is a disease

@icarus62 @freemonotheist And faith in God restores man to a state of health, and that is why the Qur’an says: ( So be steadfast in faith in all uprightness ˹O Prophet˺—the natural way of Allah which He has instilled in ˹all˺ people )
As faith is a journey back from illness to equanimity.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist you may say: Why do we have to believe that psychological maturity (which comes with faith in God) is necessary, and why do we suppose that what brings solace to man is compatible with the truth? That is the question that the atheist will end up with if he wants to oppose …

@icarus62 @freemonotheist .. the proof of instinct. The answer is that a person in his thought is obliged to begin by believing in his mind and senses and trusting them, even though he does not have the ability to prove the sincerity of the outputs of the mind and senses.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist If he wanted to prove the reliability of his mind, he would fall into circular reasoning because he would infer the mind for the mind, and the same is for the senses; It will infer it for itself, and that's circular thinking.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Every objection to the sincerity of the instinct of faith also applies to the sincerity of reason and sense. Therefore, asserting the authority of reason and sense without the instinct of faith is a contradiction in rooting the epistemological reference.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Either you reject them all, or you accept them all

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Conclusion :
1️⃣Proof of instinct, its essence is that if a person were left to himself without the influence of an external culture; He will head to heaven looking for a "Supreme Being = God" that explains existence.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist 2️⃣ Belief in God is a forced feeling in a person, and denying his sincerity is like denying the sincerity of reason and sense in seeking the truth. The claim that nature endowed us with a sober mind and a sound sense, then deceived us with a stray heart, is a….

@icarus62 @freemonotheist contradiction in the judgment on the honesty of nature.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist
The question “Who created God?” Its origin is that you think that everything has a cause, and every existing thing has a creator.
But the correct is: Everything that has a beginning must have a cause. And every creature has a creator.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist "It has a beginning" , meaning that it existed after it was not.
Everything that has a beginning must have a cause that brings it out of non-existence into existence.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist What made the plant grow? the rain
What caused the rain to fall? the cloud
And what made the clouds? rising steam
Ok, and where did this steam come from? from the seas
Who created the seas? God

@icarus62 @freemonotheist And who created God? He does not have an Creator because he is the first cause, meaning he does not have a cause.
Because if you suppose that a Creator creat God,
You will ask, and who created the Creator of the God? And so on until there is no beginning,

@icarus62 @freemonotheist and this leads to a sequence of causes
It is also called (the sequence of actors), or (Infinite regress) which is logically impossible because its result is that no creation occurs at all.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist I will give the example of a prisoner who is not released
Until a soldier receives an order from his commander, and a the commander need to receives an order from his commander, toward no beginning, the prisoner will not be released.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist If we see him released, we will know that the chain stood with the one who gave the order, without him receiving an order from anyone higher in rank than him.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Another example illustrates the impossibility of sequencing the causes to an infinity. If you enter a house and look through a door in it and see behind it a chandelier hanging from a chain, but you do not see where this chain begins, then you are certain that it had a beginnin..

@icarus62 @freemonotheist ....in the ceiling
Otherwise, it would have fallen and would not remain suspended and would not accept the idea that the chain might extend to no beginning.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist The question “Who created God?”
is a wrong question; Because there must be a first uncaused cause,
so when you say: Who created the first cause? He is no longer the first, but has become a second cause.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist If you enter your room and see your bed has changed its place
You will say: Who changed the place of the bed? Because changing its place is something that happened to the bed after it was not, while if you entered your room and did not see the place of the bed changed, you will..

@icarus62 @freemonotheist you will not ask who kept the bed in its place!!

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Since God is the first uncaused cause (unmoved mover) (prime mover), then He is not something that happened after it was not. So he doesn't need a creator

@icarus62 @freemonotheist If you see a doll that is moved by strings, and you know that behind the curtain there is a person moving it, is it acceptable to ask: Who moves the strings of this person?

@icarus62 @freemonotheist If you see a loaf of bread and you know that there must be a baker for bread, do you ask: Who has baked the baker? No, it's a funny and wrong question

@icarus62 @freemonotheist So the question “Who created God?” is a wrong question.
Like the question (What is the length of the fourth side of the triangle?)
and It is as if you are saying:
Who created the One who has no Creator?
Or who preceded the one before whom nothing came?

@icarus62 @freemonotheist A question (Who created God?) Atheists ask us to object to our belief in God, because they do not accept the idea that God is eternal without a beginning.
Tell the atheist:
Do you believe that the universe had a beginning?
If he says: “Yes”, then this universe must have a cause

@icarus62 @freemonotheist And if he says: No, the universe is eternal
Tell him: How do you object to the eternity of God and acknowledge the eternity of the universe at the same time?!
Therefore, you do not object to the principle of eternity But you object to the eternity of a Creator

@icarus62 @freemonotheist ... who created the universe with Knowledge, Will, Wisdom and Power whose effects appear in everything, yet you acknowledge the eternity of a universe, thus without a will and no existence
Then " ..leaves them in their transgression, wandering blindly." [ Quran 7:186]

@icarus62 @freemonotheist

@icarus62 @freemonotheist What is the evidence for the existence of God?
Evidence for that is everything;
What is close to you,
and what is hidden behind the horizons of your eyesight.
yourself and those around you. .
What shades you and what holds you
What satisfies you, and what pleases you.

@icarus62 @freemonotheist Just take off the familiarity blindfold and see that everything is new
Amazed! And watch out! and you will see
Existence utters a request for explanation
Existence demands an explanation
The concept of the human as something higher than the clump of atoms demands an explanation

@icarus62 @freemonotheist

@icarus62 @freemonotheist @rattibha

التصنيفات

المزيد من هذا الكاتب

مواضيع ذات صلة

الأكثر اعجابا

التصنيفات

المزيد من هذا الكاتب

مواضيع ذات صلة

الأكثر اعجابا

فك الثريد