This thread🧵will lay out the reasons I think the Russians blew the technological development necessary to deal with drone threats in Ukraine & elsewhere.
Like all really important problems, it starts with how badly you treat people...in this case, Russian engineers.👇
1/
Like all really important problems, it starts with how badly you treat people...in this case, Russian engineers.👇
1/
and fuse mounting bodies with lots of plastic tape in between to hold it all together!
It wasn't like this was a surprise.
Armed DIY drones were literally a in the air reality for a couple of years at that time thanks to ISIS.
5/
defensenews.com
It wasn't like this was a surprise.
Armed DIY drones were literally a in the air reality for a couple of years at that time thanks to ISIS.
5/
defensenews.com
Media sources at the time placed the total damage at anywhere between three strike fighters to seven strike fighters & a Hind gunship.
Hinds were death on rotary wings in Syria.
medium.com
7/
Hinds were death on rotary wings in Syria.
medium.com
7/
Drones costing maybe $100,000 put between $50 million to $400 million in high tech aircraft out of action for months. There are a -lot- of implications in those numbers.
I wrote a blog post on that attack and 23 others between Jan & Aug 2018 here:
chicagoboyz.net
8/
I wrote a blog post on that attack and 23 others between Jan & Aug 2018 here:
chicagoboyz.net
8/
Low slow aircraft with precision munitions have been a b--ch of an air defense problem for decades.
The loss of the battleship Bismarck was due in part because the ship's AA fire controls couldn't engage a 100 kt aerial target.
9/
The loss of the battleship Bismarck was due in part because the ship's AA fire controls couldn't engage a 100 kt aerial target.
9/
And while Russia is in a nasty situation regards up to date IC ships. The real issue with the TOR and Pantshir-1 isn't chips. It is the software processing it's radar returns.
10/
10/
Loading suggestions...