Hindus are pathetic at revenge
1. In 1947, we allowed 100,000 British to escape despite 200 years of brutal colonial rule during which they killed 60 million Indians and looted $43 trillion. Instead of falling upon the English and Scottish we escorted them to their ships.
1. In 1947, we allowed 100,000 British to escape despite 200 years of brutal colonial rule during which they killed 60 million Indians and looted $43 trillion. Instead of falling upon the English and Scottish we escorted them to their ships.
2. In 1971, we didn't try 93,000 Pakistan Army soldiers for horrendous war crimes. Pakistanis killed 3 million Bengalis (70% Hindus) and raped 200,000 women, but we fed them for 18 months in POW camps in India. This left permanent bitterness in Bangladeshis who wanted revenge.
3. Now see what Russia did in WWII. It paraded lakhs of German POWs through Moscow and made them walk 2,000 km to Siberia in the snow. Why was this important? The Russians humiliated the "Superior Aryan Race" in the eyes of the world. Jeering Russian crowds threw bread at them.
4. The German soldiers had killed 20 million Soviet civilians. They were mercilessly beaten by Soviet guards in subzero labour camps. 90% died of cold and starvation. Less than 50,000 German soldiers were able to survive and return. Most became mental cases, just living wrecks.
5. Russia also took vast Gernan lands and distributed them to Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary. Poland almost doubled in size while Gernany shrunk to a fifth of its WWII size. These countries were cleansed off Gernans who had lived there for centuries as they could not be trusted.
6. The Japanese also excelled at revenge. In 1942, a battle hardened and modern army of 25,000 Japanese troops burst through the jungles of Malaya and defeated a British Army of 100,00, and their AF sunk the British fleet. The Japanese treated the surrender as a major spectacle.
7. As the British, Australian and NZ POWs were marched off, the Japanese guards would whip these half naked soldiers and tell the crowds of Malays, Chinese and Indian civilians: “Look at your proud masters now.”
8. The Australians, who had indulged in rioting and rape of Singapore civilians (the people they were supposed to protect), were treated most harshly. Many became so traumatized by years of brutal captivity in Japanese camps, they became broken in spirit and body - walking dead.
9. Was such brutal treatment necessary? The Japanese wanted to prove to the Asiatics that their colonial masters were actually very ordinary people who could be beaten.
10. Author James Leasor says in Singapore: The Battle that Changed the World that the British treated Asians to an “unprecedented exhibition of their own humiliation and ineptitude”.
11. “Never in all imperial history had such a spectacle been staged before nor watched by so vast and attentive an audience. Subject peoples had watched the British destroy their own myth. Now nationalism, which had been either nascent or non-existent, surged to maturity....
12. "....If one Asiatic power could so humble the greatest imperial power in the world, then other countries suffering under imperial jackboots could rise and fight.”
13. On February 9, 1947, The New York Times published an editorial that said Japan had dropped an “atomic bomb of nationalism” in Asia. “When the Japanese came, they made three important changes...
14. First, they exploded the myth of military and social invulnerability of the ‘pukkah sahibs’. They overwhelmed their military forces in short order and then subjected white prisoners to every form of indignity and encouraged former servants of the white man to do likewise.”
15. “Second, they inaugurated a propaganda campaign that has been eagerly continued by nationalist leaders. Knowing the people could not read, the Japanese set up radio stations and established outdoor radio receiving units in practically every village....
16. Thus millions who could not be reached through the eye were reached through the ear.”
“That the colonial peoples of the Far East intend to have their freedom, and that they eventually will win it, there is little doubt. Their numbers are many times those of the white man....
“That the colonial peoples of the Far East intend to have their freedom, and that they eventually will win it, there is little doubt. Their numbers are many times those of the white man....
17. "....And for the first time in their history – thanks largely to the Japanese – they have modern arms with which to fight.”
18. “Whatever the outcome of these present days of turmoil and transition, the Far East in all probability will never again be the happy hunting ground of European imperialists and the predatory white businessman.”
19. In contrast, India suffers from decision making paralysis. One of the reasons why India didn't try the Pakistani soldiers for war crimes is @INCIndia didn't want Hindus to find out 70% of those killed were Hindus. Indira and gang felt it would give rise to Hindu nationalism.
20. During the Kargil War, AB Vajpayee ordered the IAF not to cross the LoC. Isn't it atrocious that while Pakistani soldiers were occupying peaks in Indian territory, our Air Force was barred from attacking Pakistan in the rear.
21. After the Balakot strikes, which forced the Pakistanis to ban all civilian air traffic over its territory (because Pakistan didn't have enough fuel for both the PAF and civil aviation) India's political leadership eased up the pressure.
22. Regular airspace violations would have pushed the Pakistani economy into the toilet and humiliated Pakistani forces in the eyes of public and world. But Indian leaders follow policy of least risk and resistance. You need cold killer instinct to win the war of civilization.
23. There is a Hindi word - Varchasva, the desire to dominate and be No.1. (वर्चस्व - श्रेष्ठ या मुख्य होने की अवस्था या भाव ; प्रधान्य). Hindus should have this all-consuming passion to be the most important people in the world.
24. Europeans and Muslims, with far fewer achievements have it. Chinese Hans have it. India alone is unique that it has allowed a dirt poor, backward country (that was at its mercy in 3 major wars) to grow into a dangerous nuclear armed enemy. This is the opposite of varchasv.
25. Without internalising varchasv, Hindus lack direction. We are just waiting for enemy population to explode and take over constituency by constituency. In 20 years we will have a civil war.
26. Humiliating your adversary at both global and local levels is needed to instill varchasv in common Hindus. It will also create Shatrubodh (sense of knowing your enemies) in the masses who are easily swayed by secularism and Vasudhaiva Kuttumbakam (world is one family).
Ends
Ends
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...